Encyclopedia | Library | Reference | Teaching | General | Links | About ORB | HOME
York, as England's second most important city during the Middle Ages and
as a northern stronghold against incursions
by the Scots, required a strong defensive ring. Bootham
Bar was one of the original Roman gateways into the
city/fortress of Eboracum, providing
access from the north, although the present structure is mostly of late
medieval (or later) construction. To what extent the Roman-built walls
were maintained by the Anglo-Saxons is
uncertain, but they failed to prevent its capture by
Norse invaders who, however, themselves
made effort to restore city defences once they were masters there.
The fifteenth-century city financial accounts show that expenditure on
wall maintenance was a repeated (if not huge) item in the city budget.
The temporary right to levy murage had
been granted by the king in 1226 and repeated at intervals. In 1449
the right was granted in perpetuity. Although Richard III cancelled
this on the grounds that the tolls were a
disincentive to commerce, he compensated the city with an annuity
for wall maintenance. Collection of the tolls imposed on commercial
goods at the city gates was, in the fifteenth century at least, often
leased out to private citizens, who would hope to make a profit beyond
the amount they were paying to the city for the lease.
By the close of the Middle Ages the walls and gates were strong enough,
to be a useful defence during the conflict between Yorkists
and Lancastrians. For instance, during the rebellion of Lambert Simnel
(whom the Yorkists claimed to be Edward V), "the lords Scrope of Bolton
and Upsall, constrained as it was said by their folk, came on horseback to
Bootham Bar, and there cried 'King Edward' and made assault on the gates,
but the commons who were watchmen there well and manfully defended them and
put them to flight." [The York House Books
1461-1490, ed. L. Attreed, 1991, vol.2, p.572; language modernised
somewhat by me.] Nonetheless, Henry VII criticized the city for
not keeping its walls in top condition when, two years later (in 1489),
other Yorkist rebels were able to breach the defences and capture the
city.
Although towns for the most part tried to distance themselves from the
national political conflicts that could erupt into warfare, and although
private loyalties varied in the event of such conflicts, York neither
surprisingly, nor consistently (opinion within the city being divided and
it being politic to give lip-service loyalty to whichever side was
dominant at any given time) had Yorkist
leanings during the Wars of the Roses. This was most noticeable when
Richard, Duke of Gloucester, tried to establish a power base in the north,
by winning allies there and showing himself a supportive lord to those
under his authority. City authorities prosecuted several citizens for
criticizing or slandering Richard, provided military support on
occasions of need, and expressed deep regret over Richard's death
at Bosworth. Towards Henry VII the city behaved coolly, although
cautiously, and looked instead to the Earl of Northumberland for support.
The capture of the city in 1489 was aided by Yorkist sympathizers among
the citizens.
|
Encyclopedia | Library | Reference | Teaching | General | Links | Search | About ORB | HOME The contents of ORB are copyright © 2003 Kathryn M. Talarico except as otherwise indicated herein. |